How To Survive The Crisis And Prosper In The Process is a 148 page in-depth analysis of the crisis facing the US and global economy presented in March 2007 to The Positive Deviant Network, now available to you.
For a FREE PREVIEW of the first chapter at the POSITIVE DEVIANT SUCCESS Site
"Darryl Robert Schoon's thinking provides compelling evidence that America's generally accepted economic reality is a flat earth perspective." - Marshall Thurber, of counsel FisherThurber LLP, founder of The Positive Deviant Network
"..enormously helpful in understanding the fundamental changes which may well be coming to our economy and soon."
- David Steven, investor
"The sections on money and credit shine." - Professor A. E.
Fekete, Gold Standard University
Darryl Robert Schoon's monthly commentary on the crisis facing the global economy.
The collapse of global financial markets is caused by an evolving paradigm shift that is reshaping our world.
The return to parity between the East and West is part and parcel of a greater paradigm shift now underway - a shift that is rebalancing fundamental polarities on a global scale, a shift that is affecting not only global economic and political alliances but gender as well.
- Page 98, How to Survive the Crisis And Prosper In The Process
And The Winner Is. . . Goldman Sachs
The king to the banker did say
Tis I who ride you this day
This day it is true the banker did say
But tomorrow tis I who ride you
News of Goldman’s Sachs’ triumph arrived when Reuter’s newswire reported on June 22, 2009: “Goldman Sachs on pace for record bonuses”. At a time when the US is struggling with the greatest financial crisis since the 1930s, Goldman Sachs has triumphantly weathered the crisis. That should be no surprise for Goldman Sachs created the crisis in the first place.
Bull Markets Bullsh*t & Bubbles
When credit growth is positive, bull markets result. When credit growth is excessive, bubbles result. When credit growth slows, recessions result and when credit growth contracts, all hell breaks loose.
In free markets, supply and demand determine price and profits. Capitalism’s paper-based markets, however, are not free markets. In today’s capitalist markets, price and profits are determined by credit flows emanating from government central banks.
Under capitalism—or more appropriately, under credit-based debtism—the supply and demand for credit is as important as the supply and demand for goods and services. The critical supply and demand dynamic that exists in free markets is distorted under capitalism, a distortion that will destroy capitalism just as communism was destroyed by a similar systemic distortion.
The fox is already in the henhouse. The current head of the US Treasury is none other than investment banker Henry Paulson, the former head of Goldman Sachs, the large US investment bank and major player in today’s debt markets. - Darryl Robert Schoon
See the best of our archived alerts under Classic Alerts.
On August 21, 2007, Darryl Robert Schoon delivered a talk before Session II of Gold Standard University Live (GSUL) in Szombathely, Hungary. Session II of Gold Standard University Live focused on the economic theories of the Austrian School of Economics, a school of economic thought based on free markets. Professor Fekete is a strong believer in these ideas. Darryl Robert Schoon's talk, Where We Are, How We Got Here, & Where We're Going" is available to you here as an audio download. - Click here.
DRSCHOON.COM features the articles of Professor A. E. Fekete of the Gold Standard University, a leading expert on gold and its role in financial markets and the economy.
Is Aggregate Debt Excessive?
The Obama administration is looking at the wrong ratio
A paper presented at the Santa Colomba Conference on the International Monetary System at the Palazzo Mundell, July 2009.
The Obama Administration has raised the ante in combatting the recession by increasing the debt of the government to levels that were previously considered unthinkable. It is explaining away the weakening financial structure of the country by saying that aggregate debt has not increased much relative to GDP and is therefore not excessive.
